Nanosystems Engineers
Design, develop, or supervise the production of materials, devices, or systems of unique molecular or macromolecular composition, applying principles of nanoscale physics and electrical, chemical, or biological engineering.
- O*NET-SOC code
17-2199.09 - Preparation Job Zone Five: Extensive Preparation Needed
Wages
BLS doesn't publish wages for Nanosystems Engineers separately. These are the figures for Engineers, All Other (17-2199), its parent occupation.
| 10th | 25th | Median | 75th | 90th |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $66,810 | $90,970 | $122,930 | $158,090 | $189,950 |
By state (51)
| State | Employment | Median annual | Location quotient |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 3,460 | $152,550 | 1.65 |
| Alaska | 200 | $142,390 | 0.61 |
| Arizona | 1,720 | $102,280 | 0.54 |
| Arkansas | 820 | $76,940 | 0.63 |
| California | 28,610 | $130,850 | 1.59 |
| Colorado | 2,540 | $132,590 | 0.89 |
| Connecticut | 2,430 | $124,110 | 1.44 |
| Delaware | $103,580 | ||
| District of Columbia | 3,560 | $151,920 | 5.12 |
| Florida | 8,600 | $105,410 | 0.87 |
| Georgia | 4,120 | $112,260 | 0.85 |
| Hawaii | 1,100 | $122,800 | 1.77 |
| Idaho | 560 | $130,970 | 0.67 |
| Illinois | 2,520 | $111,930 | 0.42 |
| Indiana | 1,540 | $120,880 | 0.49 |
| Iowa | 1,100 | $103,090 | 0.71 |
| Kansas | 780 | $76,100 | 0.55 |
| Kentucky | 500 | $99,830 | 0.25 |
| Louisiana | 6,310 | $99,070 | 3.29 |
| Maine | 590 | $120,430 | 0.93 |
| Maryland | 7,340 | $129,770 | 2.68 |
| Massachusetts | 2,850 | $131,260 | 0.79 |
| Michigan | 7,700 | $121,000 | 1.77 |
| Minnesota | 1,290 | $108,850 | 0.44 |
| Mississippi | 480 | $111,030 | 0.42 |
| Missouri | 1,850 | $102,980 | 0.63 |
| Montana | 240 | $97,470 | 0.47 |
| Nebraska | 300 | $88,490 | 0.29 |
| Nevada | 870 | $103,780 | 0.57 |
| New Hampshire | 610 | $128,130 | 0.90 |
| New Jersey | 4,540 | $132,450 | 1.07 |
| New Mexico | 2,190 | $162,070 | 2.54 |
| New York | 5,760 | $117,600 | 0.60 |
| North Carolina | 4,270 | $112,450 | 0.87 |
| North Dakota | 220 | $100,250 | 0.52 |
| Ohio | 7,000 | $120,470 | 1.27 |
| Oklahoma | 860 | $119,810 | 0.51 |
| Oregon | 2,030 | $123,220 | 1.04 |
| Pennsylvania | 3,250 | $108,950 | 0.54 |
| Rhode Island | 380 | $117,080 | 0.77 |
| South Carolina | 1,280 | $110,490 | 0.56 |
| South Dakota | 110 | $112,260 | 0.23 |
| Tennessee | 4,400 | $96,640 | 1.36 |
| Texas | 10,820 | $115,810 | 0.78 |
| Utah | 1,750 | $110,320 | 1.02 |
| Vermont | 390 | $126,550 | 1.29 |
| Virginia | 5,060 | $148,160 | 1.24 |
| Washington | 3,580 | $134,570 | 1.02 |
| West Virginia | 660 | $118,800 | 0.95 |
| Wisconsin | 690 | $110,360 | 0.24 |
| Wyoming | 110 | $113,050 | 0.40 |
Similar occupations
Similarity is our measure: the cosine of importance x level over all 120 O*NET skills, knowledge areas and abilities. It is not an O*NET finding. More.
Circles are the 20 most similar occupations, coloured by Job Zone. Lines join pairs where one is among the other's 10 most similar; darker lines are pairs O*NET also lists as related. Drag a circle to move it out of the way; select one to open it.
| # | Occupation | Job Zone | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Materials Engineers | 4 | 0.982 |
| 2 | Fuel Cell Engineers | 4 | 0.981 |
| 3 | Materials Scientists | 4 | 0.981 |
| 4 | Chemical Engineers | 4 | 0.973 |
| 5 | Photonics Engineers | 4 | 0.972 |
| 6 | Bioengineers and Biomedical Engineers | 4 | 0.971 |
| 7 | Nuclear Engineers | 4 | 0.967 |
| 8 | Microsystems Engineers | 5 | 0.965 |
| 9 | Hydrologists | 4 | 0.964 |
| 10 | Biochemists and Biophysicists | 5 | 0.962 |
One skill away
Among the 50 occupations most similar to Nanosystems Engineers, those at the same Job Zone or lower, where exactly one skill rated at least 3 in importance needs a level more than 0.75 points higher (on O*NET's 0-7 level scale). Our definition. Change the thresholds.
| Occupation | Skill to build | Level gap | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuclear Engineers | Operations Monitoring | 1.00 | 0.967 |
| Mechatronics Engineers | Operation and Control | 1.00 | 0.956 |
| Mining and Geological Engineers, Including Mining Safety Engineers | Management of Material Resources | 1.00 | 0.952 |
| Aerospace Engineers | Operations Analysis | 0.88 | 0.950 |
| Mechanical Engineering Technologists and Technicians | Operation and Control | 1.00 | 0.942 |
| Engineering Teachers, Postsecondary | Instructing | 1.24 | 0.940 |
| Marine Engineers and Naval Architects | Operation and Control | 1.12 | 0.937 |
| Molecular and Cellular Biologists | Learning Strategies | 1.00 | 0.933 |
Software to learn next
Software used by at least 3 of the 20 occupations most similar to Nanosystems Engineers, excluding software Nanosystems Engineers already lists and any you named. Ranked by how many of them use it, weighted by how much more common it is among them than across all occupations (lift). Our ranking.
| Software | Similar jobs using it | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| The MathWorks MATLAB | 18 of 20 | 7.5x |
| C++ | 16 of 20 | 6.7x |
| C | 13 of 20 | 8.7x |
| Microsoft Visual Basic | 12 of 20 | 5.8x |
| MathWorks Simulink | 7 of 20 | 17.0x |
| Minitab | 10 of 20 | 6.6x |
| Maplesoft Maple | 6 of 20 | 18.5x |
| Finite element analysis FEA software | 5 of 20 | 33.0x |
| Laboratory information management system LIMS | 6 of 20 | 15.4x |
| UNIX | 9 of 20 | 4.7x |
Skills
From O*NET data. Importance is rated 1 to 5 and level 0 to 7.
| Skill | Type | Importance | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reading Comprehension | Essential skill | 4.00 | 5.00 |
| Critical Thinking | Essential skill | 4.00 | 4.88 |
| Science | Essential skill | 4.00 | 4.75 |
| Speaking | Essential skill | 4.00 | 4.25 |
| Active Learning | Essential skill | 3.88 | 4.88 |
| Mathematics | Essential skill | 3.88 | 4.75 |
| Writing | Essential skill | 3.88 | 4.62 |
| Complex Problem Solving | Transferable skill | 3.88 | 4.12 |
| Judgment and Decision Making | Transferable skill | 3.88 | 4.00 |
| Active Listening | Essential skill | 3.88 | 3.88 |
| Systems Analysis | Transferable skill | 3.62 | 3.75 |
| Monitoring | Essential skill | 3.50 | 4.00 |
| Systems Evaluation | Transferable skill | 3.38 | 3.75 |
| Operations Analysis | Transferable skill | 3.25 | 4.00 |
| Technology Design | Transferable skill | 3.12 | 3.88 |
| Quality Control Analysis | Transferable skill | 3.12 | 3.75 |
| Social Perceptiveness | Transferable skill | 3.12 | 3.25 |
| Time Management | Transferable skill | 3.00 | 3.62 |
| Learning Strategies | Essential skill | 3.00 | 3.50 |
| Coordination | Transferable skill | 3.00 | 3.38 |
| Instructing | Transferable skill | 3.00 | 3.38 |
| Persuasion | Transferable skill | 3.00 | 3.38 |
| Negotiation | Transferable skill | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Operations Monitoring | Transferable skill | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Management of Personnel Resources | Transferable skill | 2.88 | 3.12 |
| Service Orientation | Transferable skill | 2.88 | 3.00 |
| Equipment Selection | Transferable skill | 2.50 | 3.38 |
| Management of Material Resources | Transferable skill | 2.38 | 2.25 |
| Operation and Control | Transferable skill | 2.38 | 2.00 |
| Programming | Transferable skill | 2.25 | 2.88 |
| Troubleshooting | Transferable skill | 2.25 | 2.62 |
| Management of Financial Resources | Transferable skill | 2.25 | 2.25 |
| Equipment Maintenance | Transferable skill | 2.12 | 2.25 |
| Repairing | Transferable skill | 2.12 | 2.12 |
| Installation | Transferable skill | 1.00 | not rated |
Knowledge (33) and abilities (52)
| Name | Importance | Level |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering and Technology | 4.62 | 5.81 |
| Physics | 4.60 | 5.90 |
| Chemistry | 4.29 | 5.76 |
| Mathematics | 4.14 | 5.52 |
| Computers and Electronics | 3.81 | 4.67 |
| English Language | 3.52 | 4.24 |
| Education and Training | 3.43 | 4.71 |
| Design | 3.38 | 4.38 |
| Production and Processing | 3.38 | 3.90 |
| Mechanical | 3.10 | 4.24 |
| Administration and Management | 3.00 | 3.86 |
| Biology | 2.85 | 3.52 |
| Customer and Personal Service | 2.48 | 2.33 |
| Administrative | 2.43 | 3.29 |
| Public Safety and Security | 2.38 | 2.71 |
| Personnel and Human Resources | 2.25 | 2.57 |
| Communications and Media | 2.14 | 2.10 |
| Economics and Accounting | 2.05 | 2.00 |
| Sales and Marketing | 2.00 | 1.86 |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1.95 | 2.00 |
| Telecommunications | 1.86 | 1.52 |
| Building and Construction | 1.76 | 1.52 |
| Law and Government | 1.65 | 1.62 |
| Psychology | 1.62 | 1.10 |
| Foreign Language | 1.48 | 1.00 |
| Transportation | 1.29 | not rated |
| Philosophy and Theology | 1.24 | not rated |
| Sociology and Anthropology | 1.24 | not rated |
| Food Production | 1.19 | not rated |
| Geography | 1.19 | not rated |
| History and Archeology | 1.14 | not rated |
| Therapy and Counseling | 1.10 | not rated |
| Fine Arts | 1.05 | not rated |
| Name | Importance | Level |
|---|---|---|
| Oral Comprehension | 4.00 | 5.38 |
| Written Comprehension | 4.00 | 5.38 |
| Deductive Reasoning | 4.00 | 5.00 |
| Inductive Reasoning | 4.00 | 4.88 |
| Oral Expression | 4.00 | 4.88 |
| Near Vision | 4.00 | 4.62 |
| Written Expression | 3.88 | 5.00 |
| Category Flexibility | 3.88 | 4.75 |
| Information Ordering | 3.88 | 4.25 |
| Mathematical Reasoning | 3.75 | 4.62 |
| Originality | 3.75 | 4.38 |
| Problem Sensitivity | 3.75 | 4.38 |
| Flexibility of Closure | 3.75 | 3.88 |
| Fluency of Ideas | 3.62 | 4.12 |
| Speech Clarity | 3.62 | 3.75 |
| Speech Recognition | 3.50 | 3.75 |
| Number Facility | 3.38 | 4.12 |
| Selective Attention | 3.25 | 3.25 |
| Visualization | 3.12 | 3.88 |
| Far Vision | 3.00 | 3.12 |
| Control Precision | 2.88 | 3.00 |
| Memorization | 2.88 | 3.00 |
| Perceptual Speed | 2.88 | 3.00 |
| Finger Dexterity | 2.88 | 2.88 |
| Speed of Closure | 2.75 | 3.00 |
| Visual Color Discrimination | 2.75 | 2.88 |
| Arm-Hand Steadiness | 2.62 | 3.12 |
| Manual Dexterity | 2.25 | 2.62 |
| Time Sharing | 2.12 | 2.25 |
| Auditory Attention | 2.12 | 2.12 |
| Reaction Time | 2.12 | 1.25 |
| Wrist-Finger Speed | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Depth Perception | 2.00 | 1.88 |
| Extent Flexibility | 2.00 | 1.88 |
| Hearing Sensitivity | 2.00 | 1.88 |
| Multilimb Coordination | 2.00 | 1.75 |
| Trunk Strength | 2.00 | 1.62 |
| Static Strength | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Rate Control | 1.88 | 1.00 |
| Explosive Strength | 1.75 | 0.75 |
| Dynamic Flexibility | 1.00 | not rated |
| Dynamic Strength | 1.00 | not rated |
| Glare Sensitivity | 1.00 | not rated |
| Gross Body Coordination | 1.00 | not rated |
| Gross Body Equilibrium | 1.00 | not rated |
| Night Vision | 1.00 | not rated |
| Peripheral Vision | 1.00 | not rated |
| Response Orientation | 1.00 | not rated |
| Sound Localization | 1.00 | not rated |
| Spatial Orientation | 1.00 | not rated |
| Speed of Limb Movement | 1.00 | not rated |
| Stamina | 1.00 | not rated |
Software used
Examples from O*NET data. "Hot" and "in demand" are O*NET flags for technologies often listed in job postings.
- Apache Hadoop hot
- Autodesk AutoCAD hot
- Dassault Systemes SolidWorks hot
- Linux hot
- Microsoft Excel hot
- Microsoft Office software hot
- Microsoft PowerPoint hot
- Microsoft Project hot
- Microsoft Visio hot
- Microsoft Windows hot
- Microsoft Word hot
- Oracle Database hot
- Oracle Java hot
- Python hot
- SAP software hot
- Salesforce software hot
- Structured query language SQL hot
- Tableau hot
- AWS Elastic MapReduce (EMR)
- Adobe FreeHand MX
- Apache MXNet
- Breault Research ASAP
- CP2K
- CPMD
- CSC Elmer
- DL_POLY
- Dassault Systemes Abaqus
- Dassault Systemes CATIA
- Data acquisition software
- ESA MOSAICS
All 49
- Finite difference time domain FDTD software
- GE Healthcare Centricity EMR
- General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System GAMESS
- IMSI Design DesignCAD
- LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator
- LinkCAD
- MAYA Nastran
- NWChem
- National Instruments LabVIEW
- Optical Research Associates LightTools
- Oracle Manufacturing Scheduling
- PTC Creo Parametric
- QuantumWise Atomistix ToolKit
- Rapid prototyping software
- SEMC-2D
- Simulation software
- Tanner EDA L-Edit
- UTQUANT
- Vienna Ab-Initio Simulation Package VASP
Where it concentrates
BLS doesn't publish wages for Nanosystems Engineers separately. These are the figures for Engineers, All Other (17-2199), its parent occupation.
Metro areas ranked by BLS location quotient: the occupation's share of the area's jobs divided by its share of all US jobs. Above 1 means more concentrated than the nation. Metros employing fewer than 100 are left out.
| Metro area | Employment | Location quotient | Median annual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexington Park, MD | 1,020 | 14.58 | $166,230 |
| Lake Charles, LA | 1,330 | 13.19 | $94,810 |
| Huntsville, AL | 3,110 | 11.77 | $155,630 |
| Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL | 830 | 6.66 | $132,650 |
| Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL | 1,620 | 6.65 | $127,400 |
| Panama City-Panama City Beach, FL | 460 | 5.07 | $115,210 |
| Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA | 440 | 4.78 | $142,130 |
| Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH | 1,650 | 4.48 | $142,080 |
| San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA | 4,970 | 4.42 | $169,650 |
| Baton Rouge, LA | 1,780 | 4.39 | $101,720 |