JobAfterNext

Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians

Implement production processes and operate commercial-scale production equipment to produce, test, or modify materials, devices, or systems of unique molecular or macromolecular composition. Operate advanced microscopy equipment to manipulate nanoscale objects. Work under the supervision of nanoengineering staff.

Wages

BLS doesn't publish wages for Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians separately. These are the figures for Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians (17-3026), its parent occupation.

Median annual wage, U.S.$66,120
Employment, U.S.75,570
Median hourly wage$31.79
Annual wage percentiles, U.S., May 2025
10th25thMedian75th90th
$47,300$55,760$66,120$80,280$99,150
By state (46)
StateEmploymentMedian annualLocation quotient
Alabama1,010$66,5100.98
Arizona2,080$66,0401.32
Arkansas330$62,2100.51
California5,710$79,0700.65
Colorado930$66,8500.66
Connecticut670$69,2600.81
Florida3,110$61,3500.64
Georgia1,840$65,0600.78
Idaho300$63,1500.73
Illinois2,260$71,0900.76
Indiana2,560$63,1101.65
Iowa710$64,4100.93
Kansas570$61,0000.82
Kentucky1,330$61,1401.36
Louisiana820Not available0.87
Maine310$63,0700.98
Maryland490$79,0900.37
Massachusetts2,070$71,8301.17
Michigan5,410$64,5102.53
Minnesota5,380$70,4903.75
Mississippi$50,180
Missouri1,220$62,4400.86
Montana90$60,3300.37
Nebraska240$59,9700.49
Nevada990$61,4701.31
New Hampshire620$69,6501.88
New Jersey920$72,8900.44
New Mexico480$61,2801.13
New York4,090$70,2900.87
North Carolina1,940$69,7200.81
North Dakota100$64,0600.50
Ohio5,340$65,4901.98
Oklahoma750$79,3300.90
Oregon910$75,7600.96
Pennsylvania1,790$65,2600.61
Rhode Island170$59,4200.71
South Carolina2,400$70,0802.15
South Dakota310$54,5701.40
Tennessee2,650$58,0701.66
Texas5,060$62,0200.74
Utah1,400$67,4901.67
Vermont110$72,4100.71
Virginia1,270$66,3100.64
Washington1,050$78,4300.61
West Virginia140$57,2400.42
Wisconsin2,660$65,2701.86

Similar occupations

Similarity is our measure: the cosine of importance x level over all 120 O*NET skills, knowledge areas and abilities. It is not an O*NET finding. More.

One skill away

Among the 50 occupations most similar to Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians, those at the same Job Zone or lower, where exactly one skill rated at least 3 in importance needs a level more than 0.75 points higher (on O*NET's 0-7 level scale). Our definition. Change the thresholds.

OccupationSkill to buildLevel gapSimilarity
Environmental Engineering Technologists and TechniciansManagement of Personnel Resources1.000.963
ChemistsScience1.120.955
Robotics TechniciansInstallation3.250.948
Validation EngineersOperations Analysis4.000.939
Nuclear Power Reactor OperatorsManagement of Personnel Resources1.000.938
Energy AuditorsSystems Evaluation0.870.932
Industrial EngineersSystems Evaluation1.000.931

Software to learn next

Software used by at least 3 of the 20 occupations most similar to Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians, excluding software Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians already lists and any you named. Ranked by how many of them use it, weighted by how much more common it is among them than across all occupations (lift). Our ranking.

SoftwareSimilar jobs using itLift
National Instruments LabVIEW15 of 2011.2x
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks11 of 208.8x
Autodesk AutoCAD15 of 204.0x
Data acquisition software6 of 2027.7x
C++12 of 205.0x
Dassault Systemes CATIA9 of 206.9x
Ansys Fluent5 of 2028.8x
The MathWorks MATLAB11 of 204.6x
MathWorks Simulink6 of 2014.6x
Python11 of 203.8x

Skills

From O*NET data. Importance is rated 1 to 5 and level 0 to 7.

SkillTypeImportanceLevel
Reading ComprehensionEssential skill 4.12 4.62
Critical ThinkingEssential skill 4.00 3.88
WritingEssential skill 3.75 4.12
ScienceEssential skill 3.62 4.00
Active ListeningEssential skill 3.62 3.75
Complex Problem SolvingTransferable skill 3.62 3.62
Systems AnalysisTransferable skill 3.50 3.50
TroubleshootingTransferable skill 3.50 3.50
Operations MonitoringTransferable skill 3.50 3.38
Active LearningEssential skill 3.38 3.75
MathematicsEssential skill 3.38 3.75
MonitoringEssential skill 3.38 3.75
SpeakingEssential skill 3.38 3.50
Judgment and Decision MakingTransferable skill 3.38 3.25
RepairingTransferable skill 3.38 3.25
Quality Control AnalysisTransferable skill 3.25 3.50
CoordinationTransferable skill 3.25 3.25
Equipment MaintenanceTransferable skill 3.25 3.25
Operation and ControlTransferable skill 3.25 3.12
Learning StrategiesEssential skill 3.00 3.38
Systems EvaluationTransferable skill 3.00 2.88
InstructingTransferable skill 2.88 3.25
Time ManagementTransferable skill 2.88 2.88
Social PerceptivenessTransferable skill 2.75 2.62
Equipment SelectionTransferable skill 2.62 2.75
Service OrientationTransferable skill 2.50 2.25
Management of Personnel ResourcesTransferable skill 2.50 2.00
ProgrammingTransferable skill 2.38not rated
PersuasionTransferable skill 2.38 2.50
Technology DesignTransferable skill 2.25not rated
Management of Material ResourcesTransferable skill 2.25 2.12
NegotiationTransferable skill 2.25 2.12
Operations AnalysisTransferable skill 2.00not rated
Management of Financial ResourcesTransferable skill 1.75 1.25
InstallationTransferable skill 1.00not rated
Knowledge (33) and abilities (52)
Knowledge
NameImportanceLevel
Engineering and Technology 4.35 5.20
English Language 4.15 4.80
Computers and Electronics 4.05 5.16
Chemistry 4.05 4.65
Mathematics 3.80 4.75
Education and Training 3.70 4.80
Physics 3.70 4.55
Production and Processing 3.40 3.55
Design 3.20 4.30
Mechanical 3.15 4.25
Customer and Personal Service 3.05 3.30
Administration and Management 2.85 3.80
Administrative 2.80 3.70
Biology 2.65 3.20
Public Safety and Security 2.65 2.55
Communications and Media 2.20 2.20
Personnel and Human Resources 2.15 2.35
Economics and Accounting 2.05 1.74
Sales and Marketing 2.00 1.90
Building and Construction 1.95 2.05
Telecommunications 1.95 1.05
Law and Government 1.75 1.35
Medicine and Dentistry 1.75 1.10
Psychology 1.65 1.25
Transportation 1.42 0.80
Foreign Language 1.42 0.68
History and Archeology 1.35 1.00
Geography 1.35 0.80
Therapy and Counseling 1.35 0.75
Fine Arts 1.26 0.53
Sociology and Anthropology 1.25not rated
Philosophy and Theology 1.15not rated
Food Production 1.10not rated
Abilities
NameImportanceLevel
Written Comprehension 4.25 4.88
Oral Comprehension 4.12 4.88
Deductive Reasoning 4.00 4.12
Problem Sensitivity 4.00 4.12
Oral Expression 3.88 4.88
Written Expression 3.88 4.50
Information Ordering 3.88 4.38
Near Vision 3.88 4.38
Inductive Reasoning 3.88 3.88
Category Flexibility 3.75 4.50
Selective Attention 3.62 3.50
Speech Clarity 3.50 3.25
Arm-Hand Steadiness 3.38 3.62
Number Facility 3.38 3.62
Mathematical Reasoning 3.38 3.38
Perceptual Speed 3.38 3.25
Speech Recognition 3.38 3.12
Fluency of Ideas 3.25 3.62
Finger Dexterity 3.25 3.38
Flexibility of Closure 3.25 3.25
Visualization 3.25 3.25
Control Precision 3.25 3.12
Originality 3.12 3.38
Far Vision 3.12 3.12
Visual Color Discrimination 3.00 3.12
Speed of Closure 2.88 3.00
Manual Dexterity 2.88 2.38
Memorization 2.75 2.75
Time Sharing 2.62 2.75
Auditory Attention 2.62 2.25
Trunk Strength 2.50 2.12
Depth Perception 2.50 2.00
Reaction Time 2.38 2.50
Hearing Sensitivity 2.38 2.25
Extent Flexibility 2.38 2.12
Multilimb Coordination 2.38 2.00
Rate Control 2.25 2.25
Response Orientation 2.25 1.88
Wrist-Finger Speed 2.25 1.75
Peripheral Vision 2.12 1.62
Static Strength 2.00 1.38
Explosive Strength 2.00 1.25
Sound Localization 1.88 1.62
Spatial Orientation 1.88 1.38
Dynamic Strength 1.88 1.12
Glare Sensitivity 1.88 1.12
Stamina 1.88 1.00
Gross Body Coordination 1.75 1.25
Night Vision 1.75 1.12
Gross Body Equilibrium 1.75 0.88
Dynamic Flexibility 1.00not rated
Speed of Limb Movement 1.00not rated

Software used

Examples from O*NET data. "Hot" and "in demand" are O*NET flags for technologies often listed in job postings.

Where it concentrates

BLS doesn't publish wages for Nanotechnology Engineering Technologists and Technicians separately. These are the figures for Industrial Engineering Technologists and Technicians (17-3026), its parent occupation.

Metro areas ranked by BLS location quotient: the occupation's share of the area's jobs divided by its share of all US jobs. Above 1 means more concentrated than the nation. Metros employing fewer than 100 are left out.

Metro areaEmploymentLocation quotientMedian annual
Warner Robins, GA2807.57$82,120
Reno, NV8306.20$61,470
Arecibo, PR1005.78$47,360
Sheboygan, WI1705.68$66,030
Bloomington, IN1905.27$62,500
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY1,2604.83$78,100
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI4,3404.57$73,060
Mansfield, OH1104.56$51,780
Fond du Lac, WI1004.46$79,500
Kalamazoo-Portage, MI2604.42$62,490

More metros, other thresholds